Seitenbereiche:
  • zum Inhalt [Alt+0]
  • zum Hauptmenü [Alt+1]

  • A: Schriftgröße: normal
  • A: Schriftgröße: groß
  • A: Schriftgröße: sehr groß
  • A: Standardfarben
  • A: Gelb auf Schwarz
  • A: Schwarz auf Gelb
  • A: Weiss auf Blau
  • A: Blau auf Weiss
Login
  • » Passwort vergessen
Hauptmenü:
  • Grundlagen
  • Materialien
  • Podcast
  • Projekte
  • Praxis
  • Newsletter

Search
Login
Twitter Facebook Instagram Mastodon Bluesky
Impressum Über uns Datenschutz English
Hauptmenü ein-/ausblenden
  • Grundlagen
    • Politische Bildung
      • Allgemeines
      • Lehrpläne
      • GSK/PB Sek I (2016)
      • Häufig gestellte Fragen
    • Demokratiekompetenzen
      • Digital Citizenship Education
      • Referenzrahmen
      • NECE-Fokusgruppe
      • Kontroverse Themen
    • Aus- und Fortbildung
      • Ausbildung
      • Fortbildung
        • Politische Bildung / Europapolitische Bildung
        • Menschenrechte
        • Weitere Themen
    • Erlässe
  • Materialien
    • Edition polis
    • polis aktuell
  • Podcast
  • Projekte
    • Aktionstage PB
      • Nachlese
    • EUropa in der Schule
      • Netzwerkaktivitäten
        • Archiv
      • Europa 30 Minuten+
      • Mitmachaktionen
      • Newsletter
        • Archiv
      • Preis: Wir sind Europa
        • 2024
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2020
      • Botschafterschulen des Europäischen Parlaments
    • Politiklexikon für junge Leute
    • LICEAL
    • VAL-YOU
    • Erster Wiener Protestwanderweg
    • Abgeschlossene Projekte
      • My Resistance, My Democracy
      • CITIZED
      • EU Democracy Rally
      • Democracy & Puppetry
      • REDE
      • Participation for Protection – P4P
        • Trainingsunterlagen für Erwachsene
        • Materialien für Kinder/Jugendliche
      • Keine Panik – PB digital vermittelt
        • Archiv #NRW19
      • VWA-Preis Gender
      • Engage – Europäische Lernmaterialien
      • Workshopreihe (BMBWF)
        • 2017/18
        • 2016
        • 2015
      • VOICE-Developing citizens
      • Kinderrechte und Partizipation
  • Praxis
    • Stundenbilder
    • Dossiers
      • DCE
      • DNAustria
      • Desinformation
      • Europa | EU
        • #AT30EU
        • Bildung | Jugendanliegen
        • Demokratie | Frieden
        • Digitalisierung | Medienkompetenz
        • Europarat
        • Kulturelle Vielfalt | Menschenrechte
        • Mobilität | VerbraucherInnenrechte
      • Extremismus
      • Fashion Revolution Day
      • Flucht und Asyl
      • Hass im Netz
      • Internationale Tage
      • Krieg und Terror
      • Leichter Lesen: Politik
      • Lesen und Politische Bildung
      • Menschenrechte
        • Kinderrechte
        • Kinderarbeit
      • Neutralität
      • OSZE
      • Sustainable Development Goals
      • Wahlen
      • Wirtschafts- und VerbraucherInnenbildung
    • Wettbewerb PB
      • Häufig gestellte Fragen
    • Workshops/Trainings
      • Trainings für Lehrkräfte
      • Workshops für Schulklassen
    • Kontaktlehrkraft PB
    • AkteurInnen (A-Z)
      • Internationale AkteurInnen
  • Newsletter
Untermenü:
  • Stundenbilder
  • Dossiers
  • Wettbewerb PB
  • Workshops/Trainings
  • Kontaktlehrkraft PB
  • AkteurInnen (A-Z)

Permanentmenü:

Inhalt:

zurück

Majority rule - a fair rule?

In democracy, the majority decides and the minority must accept this decision. The minority is expected to accept both this principle and the decisions produced by majority vote. What happens if the minority becomes a “persistent minority” – if it is permanently outvoted? The unit focuses on this problem, which is a key issue in democracies. The students analyse a model case story about a sports club and the question how the club budget is to be spent. They try to solve the problem by designing a statute.

 

Time budget 50 minutes
Grade upper secondary level (grade 9 to 13)
Competences decision-making competence, modeling competence
Learning objective

What happens when a minority is permanently outvoted? The students identify the problem of the "persistent majority" and suggest solutions.

Materials and resources

markers, flipchart, three handouts (one copy per student)/see downloads

Methods individual work, group work, plenary discussion
Curricula cross-curricular principle Citizenship Education, English lessons, curricula Citizenship Education, Law and Ethics
Original publication

© Council of Europe

Rolf Gollob, Peter Krapf, Wiltrud Weidinger (editors): EDC/HRE Volume IV. Taking part in democracy - Lesson plans for upper secondary level on democratic citizenship and human rights education (2010).

Update 29.11.2019

 

Lesson description

 

A model case story

This lesson introduces the students to the majority/minority issue. In a fictional case story, the problem is stated in the simplest possible way. A sports club is conceived as a micro-community, consisting of just two groups – one large and one small. The problem to be solved – how to balance the rights of the majority and the minority – is the same as that in society and in the political community.

 

1. Introduction: stating the problem

 

The teacher explains that the lesson will begin with a case story. He/she distributes

student handout 7.1 (see Downloads) and a student reads the story aloud.

 

The teacher asks one question: “What is the problem?” He/she aks the students to think about this question for a few moments and write down the answer.

 

In the plenary round, the students give their inputs, drawing on their notes. The teacher listens, and encourages the students to explain their ideas accurately. After about 10 students have spoken, the teacher records the key statements that have emerged on the board. It is to be expected that the students refer to the key principles of democracy, which seems to work to the advantage of the larger group, while the smaller group can refer to the principle of non-discrimination (equality).

 

The teacher links the students’ ideas to these categories, which then give structure and clarity to the discussion:

 

A small community: the sports club

 

The problem Suggested solutions
  • Violation of equal rights
  • Feeling of discrimination (violation of equal rights)
  • Permanent winners and losers (“persistent majority”)
  • Minority interests must also be respected (compromise)
  • Chess players leave the club (scenario of failure)

 

  • Democracy questioned
  • Majority decides – losers disagree
  • Change definition of majority

 

The students should be aware that this kind of conflict requires some kind of settlement. The exodus of the chess players would harm the interests of everyone. For example, each club would have to cope with additional expenses. So it is worth the effort to find a solution that meets both the principles of democracy and equality.

 

2. Setting the task

 

a. The problem

 

The students will probably have realised that the case story is a model that shows the problems of society and the majority/minority issue therefore has a political dimension. By studying a model instead of reality, the problem becomes clearer and the task somewhat easier. The results of this model case study can then be applied – compared – to reality. The teacher points out this link between case story and reality, as this explains the purpose of the task.

 

Two principles must be observed: fairness and democracy.

 

On the one hand, the majority/minority issue needs to be solved fairly – the minority will not accept being permanently outvoted and seeing its interests and needs ignored. On the other hand, democracy means that the majority rightly insists on taking the decision into its hands. So the students must draft a statute that brings these two principles together.

 

The teacher distributes handouts 7.2 and 7.3 to the students and gives them time to read handout 7.2 in silence. In a brief plenary round the students link the basic approaches outlined in handout 7.2 to their ideas on the blackboard.

 

b. The expected solution

 

The students need to know what they are to deliver. In small groups, the students will work out a draft statute that provides rules to overcome the scenario of a “persistent minority” that is permanently being outvoted. They can include rules on decision making and perhaps also rules on distributing funds. The students should be aware of the fact that the sports club is a micro-community and their statute resembles the constitution of the state. Teacher and students refer to student handout 7.3 to clarify further questions on the task if necessary.

 

3. Group work

 

The students form groups of four to six. They use the remaining time to start with the group work, which they will continue in the following lesson.

 

Downloads

 

7.1: model case story [pdf, 424 KB]

7.2: How do democracies care for the protection of minorities? [pdf, 501 KB]

7.3: drafting a statute [pdf, 193 KB]

 

Resources

 

EDC/HRE Volume I: Educating for democracy. Background materials on democratic citizenship and human rights education for teachers. Rolf Gollob, Peter Krapf, Wiltrud Weidinger (editors). Published 2010, CoE (Council of Europe)

www.living-democracy.com/textbooks/volume-1/

 

EDC/HRE Volume IV: Taking part in democracy. Lesson plans for upper secondary level on democratic citizenship and human rights education. Rolf Gollob, Peter Krapf, Wiltrud Weidinger (editors). Published 2010, CoE.

www.living-democracy.com/textbooks/volume-4/

zurück

nach oben springen
Twitter Facebook Instagram Mastodon Bluesky
Impressum Über uns Datenschutz English
Zentrum polis – Politik Lernen in der Schule, Helferstorferstraße 5, 1010 Wien
T 01/353 40 20 | service@politik-lernen.at

Bürozeiten:
Montag bis Donnerstag 10 – 15 Uhr
Auftraggeber:
Bundesministerium für Bildung
Abteilung I/10 [Politische Bildung]
Projektträger:
Wiener Forum für Demokratie und Menschenrechte
Zentrum polis - Politik Lernen in der Schule, Helferstorferstraße 5, 1010 Wien
T 01/353 40 20 | service@politik-lernen.at
nach oben springen